Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Torres v. Sher Tremonte LLP et al
as 2:2024cv05502
Plaintiff:
JOSE TORRES
Defendant:
SHER TREMONTE LLP, PHV JUSTIN M. SHER, PHV MICHAEL TREMONTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TORRES v. SHER TREMONTE LLP et al
as 2:2022cv04662
Plaintiff:
JOSE O. TORRES
Defendant:
SHER TREMONTE LLP, JUSTIN M. SHER, MICHAEL TREMONTE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
PAXTON v. PROVENTION BIO, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv11613
Plaintiff:
ADAM PAXTON
Defendant:
ASHLEIGH PALMER, PROVENTION BIO, INC. and ANDREW DRECHSLER
Petitioner:
Theo Sher and GEORGE L. JORDAN, JR.
MOHAMMAD v. SHAH et al
as 2:2019cv18022
Defendant:
HEMANT H. SHAH and PURNIMA H. SHAH
Plaintiff:
SHER A MOHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VALIC COMPANY I et al v. VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 3:2016cv07496
Plaintiff:
VALIC COMPANY I , VALIC COMPANY II , SUNAMERICA SENIOR FLOATING RATE FUND, INC. and others
Defendant:
VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC., J. MICHAEL PEARSON and HOWARD B. SCHILLER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Khan et al v. Bristol-Myers Company et al
as 3:2013cv05314
Plaintiff:
Sher Khan , James Aldridge , Charisse M. Aldridge and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Company and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HS REAL COMPANY, LLC et al v. SHER
as 2:2012cv00087
Plaintiff:
HS REAL COMPANY, LLC and COLIN HALPERN
Defendant:
ELLIS LESTER SHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SALEHI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2008cv04719
Petitioner:
SHER MOHAMMAD SALEHI
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
WIEBEL v. MORRIS, DOWNING & SHERRED et al
as 2:2007cv03150
Plaintiff:
THERESE FLAHERTY WIEBEL
Defendant:
MORRIS, DOWNING & SHERRED and DAVID L JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
