Cases 31 - 40 of 80
Sherwin-Williams Company v. Farrish of Fairfax, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00187
Plaintiff:
Sherwin-Williams Company
Defendant:
Farrish of Fairfax, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sherwin Williams Company v. Central Florida Collision Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03053
Plaintiff:
Sherwin Williams Company
Defendant:
Central Florida Collision Services, Inc., Reawattie Doobay and Narinda Doobay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Sherwin-Williams Company v. Affordable Collision Center and Auto Repair et al
as 1:2016cv02770
Plaintiff:
Sherwin-Williams Company
Defendant:
Affordable Collision Center and Auto Repair and Felipa Moreno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Filing Error
as 1:2016cv02437
Plaintiff:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Defendant:
West Park Collision Center, Inc. and David Li
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sherwin-Williams Company v. West Park Collision Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02438
Plaintiff:
Sherwin Williams Company
Defendant:
West Park Collision Center, Inc. and David Li
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sherwin-Williams Company v. Advanced Collision Center of Mobile, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02355
Plaintiff:
Sherwin-Williams Company
Defendant:
Advanced Collision Center of Mobile, Inc. and Danny Woodward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Travelers Indemnity Company et al v. Adcom Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01868
Plaintiff:
Travelers Indemnity Company and Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut
Defendant:
Adcom Group, Inc. and Sherwin-Williams Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-3979
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bickel v. Sherwin-Williams Company, The
as 2:2015cv13170
Plaintiff:
Roberta Bickel
Defendant:
Sherwin-Williams Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-5975
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
