Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hewett v. Wills et al
as 3:2021cv00048
Plaintiff:
Helen Hewett
Defendant:
Michele Michael, Kimberly Wills and Kayla Shives
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shive v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv03161
Plaintiff:
Jodie Ann Shive
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shively v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv04094
Plaintiff:
Vicki Shively
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shively et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv22681
Plaintiff:
Jeannie M. Shively and Mark Shively
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shively v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv32595
Plaintiff:
Kathryn S. Shively
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shive v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02215
Plaintiff:
Carol Shive
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shives et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00990
Plaintiff:
Christin D. Shives and Richard Lee Shives
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc. , Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shively et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv00379
Plaintiff:
Teri Key Shively and Johnny Shively
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2012md02327
Plaintiff:
Wilma Johnson (WVSD CA 2:11-0809) , Amy Holland (WVSD CA 2:12-0256) , Brent Holland (WVSD CA 2:12-0256) and others
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , American Medical Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
