Cases 11 - 20 of 147
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Shuler v. Fussell
as 3:2022cv01412
Plaintiff:
Joshua-Issiah Shuler
Defendant:
Ronald W Fussell, State of Florida and Western Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
SHULER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21532
Plaintiff:
TROY SHULER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHULER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv19483
Plaintiff:
DARRYL KENYON SHULER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHULER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14241
Plaintiff:
MARK OWEN SHULER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHULER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv10361
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SHULER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHULER et al v. AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 4:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
JOHN SHULER and JENNIFER SHULER
Defendant:
AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Shuler v. Bowman
as 4:2022cv00140
Petitioner:
Melodie Shuler
Respondent:
Sheriff William Bowman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Shuler v. Bowman et al
as 4:2022cv00128
Defendant:
Detective Brandt, Sheriff William Bowman, Captain J. McEady and others
Plaintiff:
Melodie Shuler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. SHULER et al
as 4:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
SCOTT ALLAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
J SHULER, K PEARSON, MERCER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
