Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Hollins v. Sistrunk et al
as 3:2023cv00558
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Hollins
Defendant:
Superintendent Brady Sistrunk and D. Ellis
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Jordan
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Vital Core, Burl Cain and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sistrunk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00413
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Cindy Sistrunk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Green v. Sistrunk
as 3:2017cv00765
Plaintiff:
Roger Hugh Green
Defendant:
Brady Sistrunk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Sistrunk et al
as 3:2016cv00870
Plaintiff:
La'Dale Harris
Defendant:
Michael Sistrunk, Adam Wade, Duck Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smithey et al v. Management Training Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv00409
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smithey
Defendant:
Management Training Corporation, Walnut Grove Correctional Facility, Unknown Sistrunk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. M.T.C. Walnut Grove et al
as 3:2015cv00701
Plaintiff:
Kelly Paul Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
M.T.C. Walnut Grove, Lepher Jenkins, T. Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winding v. Dean et al
as 4:2012cv00087
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
D. Dean, J. Anglin, B. Sistrunk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winding v. Bryant et al
as 4:2012cv00083
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
B. Bryant, J. Anglin, R. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winding v. Anglin et al
as 4:2012cv00078
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
J. Anglin, R. Jackson, S. Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
