Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Perry v. Cerliano
as 6:2012cv00829
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean Perry
Defendant:
Maxey Cerliano, B Jennings, Unknown Whitehead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GHJ HOLDINGS, LLC v. SLOAN VALVE COMPANY
as 5:2011cv00054
Plaintiff:
GHJ HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
SLOAN VALVE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rice v. Krug et al
as 4:2010cv00537
Plaintiff:
Reginald Donell Rice
Defendant:
James N. Krug, Stephen H. Miller, John R Roach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Rehabilitation & Re-Entry Program
as 9:2010cv00022
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Rehabilitation & Re-Entry Program, Madeline M. Ortiz, Joseph A. Bon-Jorno and others
Plaintiff:
Damon Lee Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez v. Maes et al
as 6:2010cv00014
Plaintiff:
Roberto A Perez
Defendant:
Sgt Maes, Sgt Lindsey, Captain Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rice v. Miller et al
as 4:2008cv00010
Plaintiff:
Reginald Donell Rice
Defendant:
Steven H. Miller, James N. Krug, John R Roach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Grimes et al
as 6:2007cv00472
Plaintiff:
Augustine Gonzales
Defendant:
Joe A Grimes, Paul W Sloan, Brian Rodeen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sloan v. Continental Casualty Company
as 2:2007cv00419
Plaintiff:
Ida Sloan, Ida Sloan and Ida Sloan
Defendant:
Continental Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
