Cases 71 - 80 of 150
Snell v. Moore et al
as 4:2013cv00789
Plaintiff:
Wayne Lee Snell
Defendant:
Harlen Moore and Carl Sloan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Killsfirst, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 13-6289
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INOLA KILLSFIRST, JOANNE P. MCCANN, ANNETTEE PUCKETT and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Johnson & Johnson, et al v. Killsfirst, et al
as 13-607
Petitioner:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC.
Respondent:
INOLA KILLSFIRST, JOANNE P. MCCANN, ANNETTEE PUCKETT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Newman v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2013cv00914
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Sloan Newman
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Killsfirst et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2013cv00840
Plaintiff:
Inola Killsfirst , Joanne P McCann , Annette Puckett and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Sloan v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2013cv00314
Plaintiff:
Walter A Sloan, Jr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Garcia v. Sloan, et al
as 1:2013cv00914
Petitioner:
Jimmy Garcia
Respondent:
Sloan and The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1118
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Navajo Nation et al v. Gallup-McKinley Schools Board of Education et al
as 1:2012cv01264
Plaintiff:
Navajo Nation , Kimmeth Yazzie , Sonlatsa Jim-Martin and others
Defendant:
Gallup-McKinley County Schools Board of Education , Mavis V. Price , Chee Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
