Civil Rights Cases filed in Alaska
Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00041
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dollison v. Ingram et al
as 3:2017cv00028
Plaintiff: Darnell Dollison
Defendant: C. Ingram, L. Smith, J. Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections, Parole Board et al
as 3:2017cv00002
Plaintiff: Kelly D. Smith
Defendant: State of Alaska, Department of Corrections, Parole Board and Anchorage Adult Probation and Parole Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. French et al
as 3:2016cv00153
Plaintiff: Din Ogan Shango Smith
Defendant: Lee Ann French and Leslie Johnston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Department of Revenue et al
as 3:2016cv00156
Plaintiff: Din Ogan Shango Smith
Defendant: Department of Revenue, Child Support Service Division, Luisa F. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Anchorage Police Department et al
as 3:2016cv00154
Plaintiff: Din Ogan Shango Smith
Defendant: Anchorage Police Department, Brett E. Sarber, Todd Summey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Lowery et al
as 3:2016cv00102
Plaintiff: Din Ogan Shango Smith
Defendant: Dan Lowery, Dunnington Babb and Quinlan Steiner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Johnston et al
as 3:2016cv00101
Plaintiff: Din Ogan Shango Smith
Defendant: Leslie Johnston, Cassandra Aglietti, Lee L. Saul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Corey
as 3:2016cv00103
Plaintiff: Din Ogan Shango Smith
Defendant: Michael Corey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 3:2015cv00091
Plaintiff: Frederick Banks
Defendant: Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?