Cases 1 - 10 of 192
Ray v. Roberts et al
as 6:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Kyle Sun Ray
Defendant:
Warren Roberts and Benjamin Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hiaasen v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Robert Brian Hiaasen
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Leland Beamer, John Battle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. USA
as 1:2024cv00257
Petitioner:
Anthony Wayne Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hale v. Fhuere et al
as 2:2023cv01984
Plaintiff:
Harlan James Hale
Defendant:
Corey Fhuere, Dr. B.T. Smith, K. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv01935
Petitioner:
Anthony Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bartmess v. Beamer et al
as 6:2023cv01930
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Bartmess
Defendant:
Dr. Leland Beamer, Dr. Karen Harris, Dr. Benjamin Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gibson v. Roberts et al
as 6:2023cv01896
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bruce Gibson
Defendant:
Warren Roberts, Carrie Coffey, Sabrina McCain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv01688
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Smith
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, John and Jane Does, Thomas Bristol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manley v. Bristol et al
as 6:2023cv01680
Plaintiff:
David Boylen Manley
Defendant:
Dr. Thomas L. Bristol, Dr. Michael T. Puerini, Moriam Balogun, NP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Reyes et al
as 2:2023cv01284
Plaintiff:
William S. Boyd
Defendant:
Erin Reyes, Warren Roberts, Charles Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
