Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
KimberLee Aitcheson v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1079
Other: In re: SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant / Appellee: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant: KIMBERLEE AITCHESON and DOUGLAS AITCHESON
Daly v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2018cv03948
Plaintiff: Mr. Jesse Daly and Jesse Daly
Defendant: SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION and Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Culver et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2018cv03634
Plaintiff: Mayra Culver and Charles Culver
Defendant: SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION and Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schuett v. In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2018cv02975
Defendant: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation and Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff: David Schuett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Schuett et al
as 1:2018cv02974
Defendant: David Schuett and In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leturno v. Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing
as 1:2018cv01987
Plaintiff: David Leturno
Defendant: SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller et al v. Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing
as 1:2018cv01640
Plaintiff: Janice Miller and Ronald Frank Miller
Defendant: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lundvall et al v. Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing
as 1:2018cv01490
Plaintiff: Marsha Lundvall and Mark Lundvall
Defendant: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fisher v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 2:2017cv05293
Plaintiff: Alan Fisher
In Re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bannayte v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 2:2017cv05292
Plaintiff: Clifford Bannayte
In Re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?