Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Lawrence v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas Lawrence
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Havens v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Krystle Marie Havens
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Din Ogan Shango Smith
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Carol Clarke vs. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al.
as 1:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, Federal Communications Commission, Social Security Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nelson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lynn Nelson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Francisco v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00178
Plaintiff:
David Losongco Francisco
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Apling v. Kijakazi
as 3:2021cv00162
Plaintiff:
Casey Lynn Apling
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, Andrew M. Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Perry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00148
Plaintiff:
Chevi Tolin Perry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Ruesch v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00107
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Krista Ruesch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00093
Plaintiff:
Cary Anderson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
