Cases 31 - 40 of 76
Bouvier v. Saul
as 20-1323
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLA BOUVIER
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Otero-Lopez v. Saul
as 19-2272
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RAFAEL N. OTERO-LOPEZ
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Alicea Gonzalez v. Saul
as 19-2225
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIA ALICEA GONZALEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Alicea Gonzalez v. Saul
as 19-2187
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARIA ALICEA and MARIA ALICEA GONZALEZ
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Rivera-Cepeda v. Saul
as 19-2186
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GLENDA LEE RIVERA-CEPEDA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Tavares v. IRS, et al
as 19-2144
Defendant / Appellee:
MASS HIRE, Tauton Adminstrator, DONALD MCENTIRE, HOUSE ADMINSTRATION COMMUNITY COUNSELING, of Bristol County CCBC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL D. TAVARES
Castejon v. Saul
as 19-2148
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUIS M. CASTEJON
Hart v. Ly et al
as 1:2019cv01117
Defendant:
Mark Cotterell, Nguyen Ly, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Toro-Vazquez v. Saul
as 19-2064
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of United States Social Security Administration and ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO TORO-VAZQUEZ
Mosconas v. Saul
as 19-2049
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL GENERAL COUNSEL, Region 1 and SCOTT W. MURRAY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WENDY MOSCONAS
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Social Security Administration and ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
