Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Lowe v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2009cv00130
Plaintiff:
Andrew Thomas Lowe
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Marshall v. SSA
as 7:1996cv00319
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Marshall
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hayes v. Norton Hospital et al
as 3:2008cv00561
Plaintiff:
Frank T. Hayes
Defendant:
Norton Hospital, Social Security Administration, Cook Car Lot and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Profitt v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2007cv00683
Plaintiff:
Michael Profitt
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Couch v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2007cv00068
Plaintiff:
Tammy L. Couch
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sexton v. Social Security Administration
as 7:2007cv00167
Plaintiff:
Eddie R. Sexton
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kelly v. Social Security Administration
as 7:2007cv00165
Plaintiff:
Sammy R. Kelly
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shepherd v. Social Security Administration
as 7:2007cv00155
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Shepherd
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Beeler v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2007cv00321
Plaintiff:
Doris M. Beeler
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hughes v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2007cv00018
Plaintiff:
Debra A. Hughes
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
