Cases 71 - 80 of 669
Davis v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2017cv01634
Plaintiff:
Coryesha Davis
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Girshner v. Colvin
as 6:2016cv03451
Plaintiff:
David J. Girshner
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Hatcher v Social Security Administration
as 6:2016cv03330
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Hatcher
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robinson v. Social Security Administration et al
as 4:2016cv00889
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Robinson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Internal Revenue Service and Yarbrough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Foor v. Social Security Administration, et al.,
as 2:2016cv04202
Plaintiff:
Sydney Marie Foor
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Disability Determinations Section
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Henderson v. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 6:2016cv03192
Plaintiff:
Christina Ann Henderson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Magee v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2016cv00385
Plaintiff:
Donald J Magee, Jr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Crochet v. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 6:2016cv03119
Plaintiff:
Shawn Crochet
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Carrel v. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2016cv00257
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Kay Carrel
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Harris v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2016cv00041
Plaintiff:
Randall Harris
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
