Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Schell v. Dauphin County Social Security Administration, PA
as 4:2022cv00876
Plaintiff:
Timothy Aaron Schell
Defendant:
Dauphin County Social Security Administration, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCNEIL v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2021cv02208
Defendant:
IDENTITY THEFT GUARD SOLUTIONS, INC., JOHN MORENZ, LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TRACY MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COHEN v. STEVENSON et al
as 2:2020cv04341
Defendant:
CITIBANK, NA, RUSSELL STEVENSON and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
MARTIN L. COHEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUTLER v. SAUL
as 5:2020cv02581
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramsey v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv00315
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Philip E. Ramsey, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. THE POLICE DEPARTMENT OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv04459
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA K. PARKER
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, MAXIMUM RESEARCH, THE POLICE DEPARTMENT OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MANUEL v. U.S. ARMY et al
as 2:2017cv05465
Plaintiff:
GARY E. MANUEL
Defendant:
U.S. ARMY, THE STATE COLORADO, THE STATE MAINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
