Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Terrell v. Morris et al
as 3:2017cv01317
Plaintiff:
Dane A. Terrell
Defendant:
Phillip C. Morris and Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larrea v. Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv23359
Defendant:
Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc. and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Andres A. Larrea
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446
Dedmon v. Keeble et al
as 3:2016cv00125
Plaintiff:
Eddie Dedmon
Defendant:
Jesse Wood Keeble, Jr. and Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc. v. Portable Sink Depot, Inc.
as 0:2015cv61616
Plaintiff:
Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc.
Defendant:
Portable Sink Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02880
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc. v. Spa World Corporation
as 1:2014cv22037
Plaintiff:
Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc.
Defendant:
Spa World Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv60593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pedro Roman, et al v. Southeastern Freight Lines, In
as 14-10690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEDRO ROMAN, I LOVE NY PIZZA & WINGS, INC., a Florida corporation; in case #6:13-cv-591, DOMINGO PUEBLA-MONTES, in case #6:13-cv-591 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTHEASTERN FREIGHT LINES, INC., a Foreign corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv24121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guerra v. Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc.
as 1:2013cv22070
Defendant:
Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Guerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
