Cases 1 - 3 of 3
Sills et al v. Southern Baptist Convention et al
as 3:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Michael David Sills and Mary Sills
Defendant:
Southern Baptist Convention, Dr. Ed Litton, Lifeway Christian Resources of the Southern Baptist Convention and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
MCP No.165, OSHA Covid Rule
as 21-7000
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402 and In re: MCP NO. 165, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING TRADES COUNCIL, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 32BJ, aka 32BJ SEIU, AFT PENNSYLVANIA and others
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DOUGLAS L. PARKER, in his Official Capacity as Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Administration, JAMES FREDERICK, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Administration and others
Amicus Curiae:
NEW CIVIL LIBERTIES ALLIANCE, AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, GAVEL PROJECT and others
Intervenor:
CHUCK WINDER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the Idaho State Senate, SCOTT BEDKE, in his offical capacity as Speaker of the House of Representatives of the State of Idaho, JOSE A. PEREZ and others
Southern Baptist Theological, et al v. OSHA, et al
as 21-4033
Petitioner:
SOUTHERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY and ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DOUGLAS L. PARKER, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health and MARTIN J. WALSH, in his official capacity as Secretary of Labor
Amicus Curiae:
CHARLES N. JEFFRESS, NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
