Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00156
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ada Removal- Americans with Disabilities Act
Nichols v. Spalding et al
as 3:2023cv00615
Plaintiff:
David Ronald Nichols
Defendant:
Samuel Todd Spalding, Rhonda Thomas and Kim May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spalding v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00415
Plaintiff:
Amiee Spalding
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stone v. Spalding et al
as 1:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Jackie Wayne Stone
Defendant:
Samuel Todd Spalding, Daniel Cameron and Andy Beshear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Maker's Mark Distillery, Inc. v. Spalding Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00014
Plaintiff:
Maker's Mark Distillery, Inc.
Defendant:
Theodore Jackson, Jr., Ted's Cigars and Spalding Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Hazelwood v. Doe et al
as 3:2018cv00541
Plaintiff:
Logan R. Hazelwood
Defendant:
Todd Dorsett, Amy Farrell, Emily Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spalding et al v. Harmon et al
as 2:2016cv00184
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Spalding and Anthony Melton
Defendant:
William Harmon and Hall Bros Transportation Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Atkinson et al v. Skechers U.S.A., Inc. I et al
as 3:2015cv00658
Plaintiff:
Angel Atkinson , Kim Aunkst , Etta Avant and others
Defendant:
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. I , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
