Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Speight v. Kijakazi
as 8:2022cv02659
Plaintiff:
Kevin Speight
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DuPreez et al. v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2019cv02974
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Debra DuPreez, et al.,, Jay Wilson, Antoine Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
In Re: Request for Judicial Assistance From the Federal District Court in Baltimore, Maryland in the Matter of Ilona Speight v. Dread Speight
as 1:2019cv02353
Petitioner:
United States of America s/o US Attorney for District of Maryland Office of US Attorney
Defendant:
Dread Speight
Plaintiff:
Ilona Speight
In Re:
In Re: Request for Judicial Assistance From the Federal District Court in Baltimore, Maryland in the Matter of Ilona Speight v. Dread Speight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Speight v. Berryhill
as 8:2019cv01003
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Kevin Speight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Speight v. Berryhill
as 8:2018cv01575
Plaintiff:
Sherlene Speight
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bowling v. Speight
as 8:2018cv01289
Plaintiff:
Jacob M. Bowling
Defendant:
Speight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Surgical Monitoring Services, Inc. v. Safe Passage Neuromonitoring, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv03888
Plaintiff:
Surgical Monitoring Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Safe Passage Neuromonitoring, LLC, Andrea Harmon, Edgar De Peralta and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Anderson-Speight v. Davis
as 8:2011cv00442
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Anderson-Speight
Defendant:
Terrell Davis
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Reynolds v. Speights
as 1:2010cv02334
Plaintiff:
Roy Gene Reynolds
Defendant:
R. Speights
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Speight v. Warden
as 8:2008cv01630
Plaintiff:
Dread Speight
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
