Cases 11 - 16 of 16
SPURLOCK et al v. AP GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv89056
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SPURLOCK, JR and ROBERT SPURLOCK, JR
Defendant:
AP GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., BAIRNCO CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SPURLOCK et al v. AP GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv89055
Plaintiff:
CAROL SPURLOCK, CAROL SPURLOCK, JACK D SPURLOCK and others
Defendant:
AP GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., BAIRNCO CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WARREN PUBLISHING COMPANY et al v. J. DAVID SPURLOCK D/B/A VANGUARD PRODUCTIONS, INC.
as 2:2008cv03399
Plaintiff:
WARREN PUBLISHING COMPANY, WARREN PUBLISHING COMPANY, JAMES WARREN and others
Defendant:
J. DAVID SPURLOCK and J. DAVID SPURLOCK
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SPURLOCK v. A-BEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv73694
Plaintiff:
EMMETT SPURLOCK, EMMETT SPURLOCK, EMMETT SPURLOCK and others
Defendant:
A-BEX CORPORATION, A-BEX CORPORATION, GAF CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
ASBESTOS CORPORATION, LTD., ATLAS TURNER, INC., LAC D'AMIANTE DU QUEBEC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SPURLOCK et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC et al
as 2:2007cv70849
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE C. SPURLOCK and LINDA SPURLOCK
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
KEE ACTION SPORTS LLC et al v. PROCAPS L.P. et al
as 1:2007cv00192
Plaintiff:
KEE ACTION SPORTS LLC, KEE ACTION SPORTS LLC, KEE ACTION SPORTS LLC and others
Defendant:
PROCAPS L.P., PROCAPS L.P., STRATEGIC SPORTS, INC. and others
Counter Claimant:
PROCAPS DIRECT, PROCAPS DIRECT, IMPERIAL CAPITAL CORPORATION and others
Counter Defendant:
KEE ACTION SPORTS LLC, KEE ACTION SPORTS I LLC, KEE ACTION SPORTS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
