Cases 11 - 20 of 56
Morton v. Acorn Outdoor Services, Inc. et al
as 9:2020cv00245
Plaintiff:
Dusty Morton, Brent Harvey, Ray Jackson and others
Defendant:
Acorn Outdoor Services, Inc. and Justin Penick
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kennemer v. Parker County et al
as 4:2020cv00056
Defendant:
Tom Spurlock, FNU Coffee, Larry Fowler and others
Plaintiff:
John David Kennemer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Hutto et al
as 9:2020cv00011
Defendant:
B Johnson, K Hutto, Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Hutto et al
as 3:2020cv00070
Defendant:
B Johnson, K Hutto, Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Collier et al
as 6:2019cv00213
Plaintiff:
Roy Shiloh Bryant and Roy Lee Bryant
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Carrie L Whatley, Samuel Dominey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Collier et al
as 9:2019cv00082
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Bryant and Roy Shiloh Bryant
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Carrie L Whatley, Samuel Dominey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson et al v Shelby Operating Company et al
as 2:2019cv00076
Defendant:
Colter Harris, Shelby Resource Management, Pamela Tyiska and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Anderson and Ethel Pogue
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Jones v. Spurlock et al
as 3:2019cv00066
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, Pardons and Paroles Board of the Eastern Tx Division, NFN Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Spurlock et al
as 9:2018cv00223
Defendant:
FNU Spurlock, FNU Scott, Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Spurlock et al
as 3:2018cv03353
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, FNU Scott, FNU Spurlock and others
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
