Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Jones v. Spurlock et al
as 9:2018cv00205
Defendant:
Captain NFN Scott, NFN Antonio and G Spurlock
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Spurlock et al
as 3:2018cv03112
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, FNU Scott, FNU Spurlock and others
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Spurlock et al
as 3:2018cv03110
Defendant:
NFN Scott, NFN Antonio and G Spurlock
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spurlock v. Cole International Tubular Service, LLC d/b/a Cole Enterprises International Tubular Services
as 4:2017cv02674
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Spurlock
Defendant:
Cole International Tubular Service, LLC d/b/a Cole Enterprises International Tubular Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Spurlock v. Kazmierczak
as 4:2017cv01564
Plaintiff:
Daphne Octavia Spurlock
Defendant:
Donna Kazmierczak
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spurlock v. Kazmierczak CASE TRANSFERRED TO SD/TX HOUSTON DIVISION.
as 1:2017cv00212
Petitioner:
Daphne Octavia Spurlock
Respondent:
Donna Kazmierczak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Franklin v. Doyle et al
as 9:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Franklin
Respondent:
Sharon D Allen, John D. Stubblefield, Mitchell D. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Doyle et al
as 3:2017cv00069
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Franklin
Defendant:
Larry G. Doyle, Sharon D. Allen, John D. Stubblefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Doyle et al
as 4:2017cv01163
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Franklin
Defendant:
Larry G. Doyle, Sharon D. Allen, John D. Stubblefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spurlock et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2017cv00471
Plaintiff:
Sheila Spurlock and Ben Spurlock
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
