Cases 21 - 30 of 106
Spurlock et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv29679
Plaintiff:
Shirley Spurlock and Richard Spurlock
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spurlock-Elliott v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv27128
Plaintiff:
Diana Lee Spurlock-Elliott
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spurlock et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv14131
Plaintiff:
Lucy Spurlock and Bobby Spurlock
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Spurlock et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv04768
Plaintiff:
Virginia Spurlock and Larry Spurlock
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Spurlock v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv02062
Plaintiff:
Melinda J. Spurlock
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Transmission of Bankruptcy Reference
Spurlock v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
as 3:2010mc00054
Plaintiff:
Paul Richard Spurlock
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation
Meyers, et al v. GC Services, L.P.
as 3:2009cv01242
Plaintiff:
Lora Meyers, Sherry Clere, Patricia Glass and others
Defendant:
GC Services, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Spurlock v. Hurst
as 3:2009cv00605
Plaintiff:
Gilbert L. Spurlock
Defendant:
Dana R. Hurst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Dougherty v. Cerra
as 2:2009cv00443
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Dougherty, Cheryl Dougherty, Cheryl Dougherty and others
Defendant:
Ramona Cerra, Ramona Cerra, Ramona Cerra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
