Cases 1 - 10 of 205
Stevens v. Stevens et al
as 3:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
Coralie Jane Stevens
Defendant:
Nicole Marie Stevens, Wesley Allen Ream, Jr., Wesley Allen Ream, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
McCrary v. Kotek et al
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Dathan Jude McCrary, Sr
Defendant:
Tina Kotek, Ellen F. Rosenblum, Mike Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. State of Oregon
as 3:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jason Pierce, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. State of Oregon
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jason Pierce, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Middlekauff v. Reyes
as 2:2023cv01817
Petitioner:
Darrell Kelly Middlekauff, Sr.
Respondent:
Superintendent Erin Reyes and Erin Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wicks et al v. Honl et al
as 3:2023cv01657
Plaintiff:
Norman Wicks, Sr. and Norman Wicks, Jr.
Defendant:
Ofc. Caleb Honl and City of Portland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wicks et al v. Alo et al
as 3:2023cv01537
Plaintiff:
Norman Wicks, Sr. and Norman Wicks, Jr.
Defendant:
Roba Alo, State of Oregon Senior Services and Gresham Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Wicks et al v. Auxier et al
as 3:2023cv01278
Plaintiff:
Norman Wicks, Sr. and Norman Wicks, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeff Auxier and Det. David Peabody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Propm Management Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00847
Plaintiff:
Larry L. Bell, Sr.
Defendant:
Propm Management Inc. and Yui Andy Tang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
