Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Bryant et al v. City of Norfolk et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00026
Defendant: Dr. Benjamin S. Carson, City of Norfolk, United States Department of Housing & Urban Development and others
Plaintiff: Brandon Sprately, Conswayla Simmons, Evonne Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02820
Defendant: Lumber Liquidators, Inc., Federal Insurance Company, Continental Casualty Company and others
Plaintiff: St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2018md02836
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., MSP Singapore Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff: FWK Holdings, LLC, HEB Grocery Company L.P., All End Payer Plaintiffs and others
In Re: In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
Interested Party: Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc., Apotex USA, Inc. and Apotex Corp., WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Petitioner: AmerisourceBergen Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, H.D. Smith, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Giant Eagle, Inc., Burlington Drug Company, Inc., Dakota Drug, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
ST. PAUL ELECTRICAL WORKERS HEALTH PLAN, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00232
Plaintiff: ST. PAUL ELECTRICAL WORKERS' HEALTH PLAN, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Defendant: Merck & Co., Inc. , Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. , Schering-Plough Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company et al v. Southland Concrete Corporation
as 1:2017cv00305
Plaintiff: St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company and The Travelers Indemnity Company of America
Defendant: Southland Concrete Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
States Self-Insurers Risk Retention Group, Inc. v. City of Newport News, Virginia et al
as 4:2015cv00105
Plaintiff: States Self-Insurers Risk Retention Group, Inc.
Defendant: City of Newport News, Virginia, Thomas E. Bennett, Patricia L. Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv00034
Plaintiff: Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company , Liberty Insurance Corporation , Employers Insurance Company of Wausau and others
Defendant: Lumber Liquidators, Inc. and Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc.
Intervenor_plaintiff: Continental Casualty Company , American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Southland Concrete Corporation v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company et al
as 1:2015cv00504
Plaintiff: Southland Concrete Corporation
Defendant: St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company and The Travelers Indemnity Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Contract Insurance
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company et al v. comScore, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00034
Plaintiff: St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company , The Travelers Indemnity Company of America and The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company
Defendant: comScore, Inc. and Columbia Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Sea Tow Services International, Inc. v. St. Paul F & M Insurance Company
as 1:2013mc00006
Plaintiff: Sea Tow Services International, Inc.
Defendant: St. Paul F & M Insurance Company
Movant: BoatU.S.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?