Cases 1 - 4 of 4
In re: Toshisada Onishi, et al
as 22-1589
Petitioner:
In re: TERUKO ONISHI, TOSHISADA ONISHI and D.A.O.
Respondent:
DAVID C. CHAPLEAU, In his individual and official capacity as St. Joseph County Judge, MICHAELENE M. MACHOWIAK, In their individual and official capacity as St. Joseph County Prosecutors, ELAINE B. BROWN, In their individual and official capacity as Judges of Indiana Court of Appeals and others
Whole Woman's Health Alliance, et al v. Theodore Rokita, et al
as 21-2573
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE, ALL-OPTIONS, INC. and JEFFREY GLAZER, M.D.
Defendant / Appellant:
THEODORE E. ROKITA, Attorney General of the State of Indiana, in his official capacity, KRISTINA BOX, Commissioner of the Indiana State Department of Health, in her official capacity, JOHN STROBEL, M.D., President of the Indiana Medical Licensing Board of Indiana, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Whole Woman's Health Alliance, et al v. Todd Rokita, et al
as 21-2480
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE, ALL-OPTIONS, INC. and JEFFREY GLAZER, M.D.
Defendant / Appellant:
THEODORE E. ROKITA, Attorney General of the State of Indiana, in his official capacity, KRISTINA BOX, Commissioner of the Indiana State Department of Health, in her official capacity, JOHN STROBEL, M.D., President of the Indiana Medical Licensing Board of Indiana, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
LITTLE ARM INC. et al v. ADAMS COUNTY PROSECUTOR et al
as 1:2013cv00862
Defendant:
ADAMS COUNTY PROSECUTOR, ALLEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR, BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY PROSECUTOR and others
Plaintiff:
BOHEMIAN GROOVE LLC, IDK ANYTHING LLC, LITTLE ARM INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
