Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 1 U.S.C. § 102 Americans with Disabilities Act
Harms v. Kankakee Community College et al
as 2:2020cv02281
Defendant:
Kankakee Community College, AMITA Health St. Mary's Hospital Kankakee, Amita Health doing business as AMITA Health St. Mary's Hospital Kankakee and others
Plaintiff:
Alyssia Harms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Khan v. St. Mary Hospital et al
as 1:2020cv03819
Defendant:
St. Mary Hospital, Thomas Mulvar, Savedra Olga and others
Plaintiff:
Nazir Khan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02303
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Tyus v. St. Mary's Hospital Decatur
as 2:2012cv02157
Plaintiff:
Linda Tyus
Defendant:
St. Mary's Hospital Decatur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bryant v. Kankakee County Courthouse et al
as 2:2009cv02286
Plaintiff:
Aaron Bryant
Defendant:
Kankakee County Courthouse, Kids Hope United of Kankakee, Kelly McGee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bruhl v. Residences et al
as 1:2009cv01054
Plaintiff:
Edwin P Bruhl, Sr
Defendant:
Immanuel Residences, St. Mary's Hospital, Downers Grove Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rogers v. City of Decatur Illinois et al
as 2:2008cv02170
Plaintiff:
Lula P Rogers
Defendant:
City of Decatur Illinois, S Hegemeyer, Macon County States Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
