Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Whitton v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Whitton
Defendant:
Sheriff Stacy Williams and Tony Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DRURY v. UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE
as 1:2021cv15409
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY DRURY
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, LISA RENEE MILLS, BRADLEY KAUFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PRIOR-RAMIREZ v. WILLIAMS-HALL et al
as 1:2021cv04321
Defendant:
APN STACY WILLIAMS-HALL and JOHN DOE(S) 1-10
Plaintiff:
OSCAR PRIOR-RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERKEL v. RUTGERS et al
as 2:2020cv16686
Defendant:
MR. WILLIE BONDS, DR. M. FINLEY, DR. H. and others
Plaintiff:
MELVIN K. MERKEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Young et al
as 1:2020cv00092
Defendant:
Major John H. Bush, Captain Cassandra Haynes, Major Chester V. Huffman and others
Plaintiff:
Quame Lamar Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Johnson et al
as 3:2010cv00701
Plaintiff:
Robert M Boyd
Defendant:
Yolanda Johnson, Marvin Powers, Ms Vinard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herndon v. Bush et al
as 1:2007cv00152
Plaintiff:
Bobby Marshay Herndon
Defendant:
John Bush, C and H Hamilton Maintenance Contracting Service and Stacy Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhoden v. Powers et al
as 3:2007cv00603
Plaintiff:
Marvin Rhoden
Defendant:
Marvin Powers, Terry Caliper, Stacy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Merchant et al
as 3:2007cv00341
Plaintiff:
Ozzie Pickett
Defendant:
Jay Merchant, Jacob Null, Jason Garnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Merchant et al
as 1:2007cv01041
Plaintiff:
Ozzie Pickett
Defendant:
Jay Merchant, Jacob Null, Jason Garnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
