Cases 21 - 30 of 250
SHANNON v. KNIGHT
as 1:2017cv00138
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
MARK A. SHANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHANNON v. KNIGHT
as 1:2017cv00139
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
MARK A. SHANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHANNON v. KNIGHT
as 1:2017cv00099
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
MARK A. SHANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHANNON v. KNIGHT
as 1:2017cv00079
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
MARK A. SHANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VANCLEAVE v. KNIGHT
as 1:2017cv00040
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
GREGORY VANCLEAVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VANCLEAVE v. BUGHER et al
as 1:2017cv00039
Respondent:
ROBERT BUGHER, GAGNON, STANLEY KNIGHT and others
Petitioner:
GREGORY VANCLEAVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AVERITTE v. BUGHER et al
as 1:2016cv03502
Petitioner:
DERRICK AVERITTE
Respondent:
ROBERT BUGHER, K. HARTZELL, STANLEY KNIGHT and others
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAINES v. KNIGHT
as 1:2016cv02742
Petitioner:
JAREL T. HAINES
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. KNIGHT
as 1:2016cv02601
Petitioner:
DEVIN JESSY JONES
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOWLING v. KNIGHT
as 1:2016cv01913
Petitioner:
STEVEN B. BOWLING
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
