Cases 71 - 80 of 246
Smith v. Williams et al
as 6:2017cv00016
Plaintiff:
Omari Akile Smith
Defendant:
Stanley Williams, John Harris and Jessica Harden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROCK v. WILLIAMS et al
as 7:2017cv00003
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LEVON ROCK
Defendant:
STANLEY WILLIAMS and SHUNDA WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWARD v. WILLIAMS
as 3:2016cv00170
Petitioner:
SPRATT HOWARD
Respondent:
STANLEY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clayton v. Williams
as 6:2016cv00174
Plaintiff:
Earnest Clayton
Defendant:
Stanley Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garry Mullis v. Nathan Deal, et al
as 16-17374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARRY D. MULLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHAN DEAL, Defendant is sued in official and their individual capacity, HOMER BRYSON, Defendant is sued in official and their individual capacity, STANLEY WILLIAMS, Defendant is sued in official and their individual capacity and others
JOHNSON v. JACOBS et al
as 7:2016cv00210
Plaintiff:
ERIC O'BRIEN JOHNSON
Defendant:
RICK JACOBS, OTIS STANTON, MARTY ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Williams et al.
as 6:2016cv00151
Plaintiff:
Earnest Clayton
Defendant:
Stanley Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. William
as 1:2016cv04071
Petitioner:
Terrence Raymone White
Respondent:
Stanley William and Glen Johnson
Defendant:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clayton v. Murray, et al
as 6:2016cv00143
Plaintiff:
Ernest Clayton
Defendant:
Dennis Murray, Emmitt Donahue, Brian Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Xavier Daniels v. Georgia Department of Correcti, et al
as 16-16719
Plaintiff - Appellant:
XAVIER DANIELS
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT TOOLE, Georgia State Prison, in his individual capacity and STANLEY WILLIAMS, Warden Smith State Prison, in his individual capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
