Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Beaudet et al v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 6:2016cv01814
Defendant:
Baker Properties, LLC and Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff:
Bridget Beaudet and George J. Beaudet, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Beaudet v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv01814
Defendant:
Baker Properties, LLC and Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff:
George Beaudet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Paharia v. Starbucks Corporation
as 3:2016cv04600
Plaintiff:
Neeru Paharia
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ellis v. Starbucks Corporation
as 3:2015cv03451
Plaintiff:
Yosha Ellis
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dittenhofer et al v. Bodum USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01179
Defendant:
Bodum USA, Inc. and Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Dittenhofer and Julie Jenkerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marshall vs. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2015cv00037
Plaintiff:
Earl Marshall and Bridget Marshall
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amy Wels-v-Starbucks Corp.
as 3:2014cv00200
Plaintiff:
Amy Wels
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kurnick v. Starbucks Corporation, et al
as 2:2011cv01985
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Kurnick
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pasinger v. Starbucks Corporation aka Starbucks Coffee Company et al
as 3:2007cv00452
Plaintiff:
Thomas Pasinger and Thomas Pasinger
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation aka Starbucks Coffee Company, Rich Soderberg, Dorothy Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Henson v. Starbucks, et al
as 3:2007cv00368
Plaintiff:
Brittany Henson
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation aka Starbucks Coffee Company and Starbucks Corporation aka Starbucks Coffee Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
