Cases 31 - 40 of 992
Nivens v. State of Maryland
as 1:2023cv00956
Petitioner:
Stephen Nivens
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fallon v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2023cv00604
Petitioner:
Andre Walter Fallon
Respondent:
State of Maryland and Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. State of Maryland
as 1:2023cv00485
Petitioner:
Michael Desmond Martin
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mansaray v. Dean et al
as 1:2023cv00203
Petitioner:
Mohamed Mansaray
Respondent:
Robert Dean and The State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Santos Bey v. Frosh et al
as 1:2023cv00149
Petitioner:
Erick Javier Santos Bey
Respondent:
Brian Frosh, Warden Robert Dean and The State Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. State of Maryland
as 1:2022cv03381
Petitioner:
Kent Bell
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chaney v. State of Maryland
as 1:2022cv03319
Petitioner:
Keith Chaney
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gorham v. State of Maryland
as 1:2022cv03233
Petitioner:
Antonio Gorham
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson, Jr. v. Werner et al
as 1:2022cv03118
Petitioner:
Dyron Jackson, Jr.
Respondent:
Maryland Attorney General, Gregory A. Werner and Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. State of Maryland
as 1:2022cv03104
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Thomas
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
