Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Beagle v. State of Michigan
as 8:2013cv02110
Plaintiff: Tammy Sue Beagle
Defendant: State of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
United States of America et al v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2013mc22949
Plaintiff: United States of America , State of California , State of Florida and others
Defendant: Sears Holdings Corporation and Kmart Corporation
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
United States of America ex rel. v. Rite Aid Corporation
as 1:2012cv02431
Plaintiff: United States of America Ex Rel, State of California, ex rel., State of Colorado, ex rel. and others
Defendant: Rite Aid Corporation, 112 Burleigh Avenue Norfolk, LLC, 1515 West State Street Boise, Idaho, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
State of Florida, et al v. U.S. Dept. of HHS, et. al.,, et al
as 11-11067
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF FLORIDA, BY AND THROUGH PAM BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through Jon Bruning Attorney General, STATE OF TEXAS, by and through Greg Abbott Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: MARY BROWN, An individual
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, THE NATIONAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD, STATE LEGISLATORS and others
Not Classified By Court: JAMES F. BLUMSTEIN, THE INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE, PHILIP E. BERGER and others
Plaintiff: HR POLICY ASSOCIATION
United States of America ex rel et al v. Plavin, M.D. et al
as 1:2011cv02513
Plaintiff: Herbert E. Robbins, United States of America, The State of Michigan and others
Defendant: Stanford Plavin, M.D., Ambulatory Anesthesia of Atlanta, L.L.C., Northwest Georgia Orthopedic Surgery Center, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
State of Florida, et al v. U.S. Dept. of HHS, et. al.,, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-11067
Plaintiff - Appellant: STATE OF FLORIDA, BY AND THROUGH PAM BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through Jon Bruning Attorney General, STATE OF TEXAS, by and through Greg Abbott Attorney General and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: MARY BROWN, An individual
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Re El et al v. State of Michigan
as 1:2011mi00017
Plaintiff: Jaame Amun Re El and Jaame Amun Re El Holding Corp.
Defendant: State of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
El v. The Department of Human Services of the State of Michigan et al
as 1:2010cv03747
Plaintiff: Tracy El
Defendant: The Department of Human Services of the State of Michigan Division of Family and Children Services and The City of Roswell, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hairston v. State of Michigan
as 1:2010cv03751
Plaintiff: Julie Hairston
Defendant: State of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STATE OF FLORIDA et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00091
Plaintiff: STATE OF FLORIDA, by and through BILL MCCOLLUM , STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, by and through HENRY McMASTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through JON BRUNING, ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as THE SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?