Voting Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
NRSC, et al v. FEC, et al
as 24-3051
Plaintiff: NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE, JAMES D. VANCE, Senator and others
Defendant: FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ALLEN JOSEPH DICKERSON, in his official capacity as a Commissioner and the Chair of the Federal Election Commission, DARA LINDENBAUM, in her official capacity as a Commissioner and the Vice Chair of the Federal Election Commission and others
Amicus Curiae: MITCH MCCONNELL, Senator, INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH, STATE OF OHIO and others
Disability Rights MS v. Fitch
as 23-60463
Plaintiff / Appellee: Disability Rights Mississippi, League of Women Voters of Mississippi, William Earl Whitley and others
Defendant / Appellant: Lynn Fitch, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and Michael D. Watson, Jr., in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Mississippi
Robinson v. Ardoin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-30333
Plaintiff / Appellee: Press Robinson, Edgar Cage, Dorothy Nairne and others
Defendant / Appellant: Kyle Ardoin, in his official capacity as Secretary of State for Louisiana
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: Clay Schexnayder, Patrick Page Cortez and State of Louisiana - Attorney General Jeff Landry
Amicus Curiae: State of Alabama, State of Arkansas, State of Georgia and others
Not Classified By Court: James F. Blumstein
Thompson et al v. Attorney General of the State of Mississippi et al THREE JUDGE PANEL: REEVES, GRAVES, JORDAN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00620
Plaintiff: Rickey Thompson and Rencie Fells
Defendant: Attorney General of the State of Mississippi , Lee County Democratic Party Executive Committee and Lee County Election Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Perkins et al v. McAdams We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00131
Plaintiff: Sheriel F. Perkins and The State of Mississippi on Relation of Sheriel F. Perkins
Defendant: Carolyn McAdams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Keith Judd v. Secretary of State of MS, et al
as 12-60660
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Defendant - Appellee: SECRETARY OF STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Tallahatchie Cty MS Br NAACP, et al v. Tallahatchie Cty MS Bd of Supr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-60676
Plaintiff - Appellant: TALLAHATCHIE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRANCH OF THE NAACP and JOHNNY THOMAS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Appellant: DOROTHY CHESTNUT
Defendant - Appellee: TALLAHATCHIE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, TALLAHATCHIE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI DEMOCRATIC PARTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, TALLAHATCHIE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI REPUBLICAN PARTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE and others
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee: JIM HOOD, Attorney General for the State of Mississippi, ex
Tunica County, MS Branch NAACP, et al v. Tunica County, MS Bd of Supr, et al
as 11-60674
Plaintiff - Appellant: TUNICA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRANCH OF THE NAACP and MARILYN YOUNG, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee: JIM HOOD, Attorney General for the State of Mississippi, Ex Rel. The State of Mississippi
Defendant - Appellee: TUNICA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, TUNICA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI DEMOCRATIC PARTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, TUNICA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI REPUBLICAN PARTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE and others
Keith Judd v. Secretary of State of MS, et al
as 11-60580
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Defendant - Appellee: SECRETARY OF STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Judd v. Secretary of State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2011cv00351
Plaintiff: Keith Russell Judd
Defendant: Secretary of State of Mississippi and State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Type: Civil Rights Voting

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?