Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-16008
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
A&A Towing, Inc. v. Nevada Transportation Authority et al
as 3:2021cv00049
Plaintiff:
A&A Towing, Inc.
Defendant:
Nevada Transportation Authority, Nevada Highway Patrol, TEGSCO, LLC dba Auto Return and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tony Pressler v. Dotty Casino and Employees, et al
as 20-15901
Defendant / Appellee:
KYLE JONES, DENNIS WILLIAMS, MYLER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONY ALLEN PRESSLER
Renck v. Novak et al
as 3:2019cv00622
Defendant:
Kristina Swallow, Mayor Rod Woodberry, Trooper Travis Smaka and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Renck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Rick McLellan v. State of Nevada Department, et al
as 18-15529
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICK MCLELLAN
Defendant - Appellant:
STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, CHRIS PERRY, in his individual capacity, JAROLD HAFEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Matt Moonin, et al v. Kevin Tice, et al
as 15-16571
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MATT MOONIN, DONN YARNALL and ERIK LEE
Defendant - Appellant:
KEVIN TICE
Defendant:
LUIS ZAPATA and STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, HIGHWAY PATROL DIVISION (NHP)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
