Cases 21 - 28 of 28
The Dan Abrams Company LLC, et al v. Medtronic Inc., et al
as 19-55995
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK DEGGENDORF GMBH, MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THE DAN ABRAMS COMPANY LLC, Relator
State of Oregon, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-35386
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, PLANNED PARENTHOOD COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DIANE FOLEY, OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae:
SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, SOCIETY FOR ADOLESCENT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, AND SOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE and others
State of California, et al v. March for Life, et al
as 19-15150
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
MARCH FOR LIFE EDUCATION AND DEFENSE FUND
Amicus Curiae:
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SCHOLARS, FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE, RELIGIOUS SISTERS OF MERCY and others
State of California, et al v. USHHS, et al
as 19-15118
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
THE LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR JEANNE JUGAN RESIDENCE
Amicus Curiae:
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SCHOLARS, RELIGIOUS SISTERS OF MERCY, TEXAS, , ALABAMA, ARKANSAS, GEORGIA, IDAHO, LOUISIANA, MISSOURI, MONTANA, NEBRASKA, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, UTAH, and WEST VIRGINIA and others
State of California, et al v. The Little Sisters of the Poor, et al
as 19-15072
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
THE LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR JEANNE JUGAN RESIDENCE
Amicus Curiae:
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SCHOLARS, FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE, RELIGIOUS SISTERS OF MERCY and others
State of New York, et al v. FCC, et al
as 18-70692
Petitioner:
STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Intervenor - Pending:
NCTA-THE INTERNET & TELEVISION ASSOCIATION, CTIA - THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION, USTELECOM-THE BROADBAND ASSOCIATION and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Azael Perales v. FBI, et al
as 17-56213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Training Academy, National Academy, ALBANY, Counties Covered: Albany, Fulton, Hamilton, Montgomery, Rensselaer, Saratoga, Schenectady, Schoharie, Warren, and Washington, ALBUQUERQUE, Counties Covered: Bernalillo, Catron, Cibola (eastern half Guadalupe, Quay, Sandoval, Soccorro, Torrence and Valencia and others
State of Washington, et al v. Donald J. Trump, et al
as 17-35105
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON and STATE OF MINNESOTA
Intervenor - Pending:
DAVID GOLDEN
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, REX W. TILLERSON, Secretary of State and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF HAWAII
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES AND OTHER BUSINESSES, FRED KOREMATSU CENTER FOR LAW AND EQUALITY, LAW PROFESSORS AND CLINICIANS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
