Cases 31 - 40 of 74
Zachary Silbersher, et al v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals Intern, et al
as 20-16176
Not Classified By Court:
ADAMAS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC., SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD., DR. FALK PHARMA GMBH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZACHARY SILBERSHER, Relator
State of Washington, et al v. DOS, et al
as 20-35391
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls, CORDELL HULL, BUREAU OF INDUSTRY AND SECURITY and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
FREDRIC'S ARMS & SMITHS, LLC and NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.
State of California et al v Wheeler
as 3:2020cv03005
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Maryland, City of New York and others
Defendant:
Andrew Wheeler, R. D. James, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Amicus Curiae:
Duarte Nursery, Inc., North American Lake Management Society, Society for Ecological Restoration and others
Intervenor Defendant:
State of Alaska, State of Nebraska, State of Texas and others
Petitioner:
National Cattlemen's Beef Association, American Road and Transportation Builders Association, Edison Electric Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of Washington, et al v. Second Amendment Foundation, et al
as 20-35064
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., CONN WILLIAMSON and SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION
Defendant:
DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls and others
Benjamin Barber v. State of Oregon, et al
as 20-35051
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN BARBER
Defendant:
SIMON, Hon. Judge; For the US District Court for the District of Oregon and ACOSTA, Hon. Judge; For the US District Court for the District of Oregon
State of Washington et al v. United States Department of State et al
as 2:2020cv00111
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce, Michael R. Pompeo, U.S. State Department and others
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Washington, et al v. Defense Distributed, et al
as 20-35030
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED
Defendant:
DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls and others
The Dan Abrams Company LLC, et al v. Medtronic Inc., et al
as 19-56377
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK DEGGENDORF GMBH, MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THE DAN ABRAMS COMPANY LLC, Relator
George v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina et al
as 4:2019cv00076
Defendant:
Health Management Systems, North Carolina State Health Plan for Teachers and State Employees, State of North Carolina and others
Plaintiff:
Lauren M. George
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection et al v. Consumer Advocacy Center Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv01998
Defendant:
Tuong Nguyen, Albert Kim, Kaine Wen and others
Receiver:
Thomas W McNamara
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, The People of the State of California and others
Petitioner:
Edu Doc Support, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
