Cases 1 - 10 of 11
OLOWU v. MILGRAM et al
as 2:2009cv00956
Plaintiff:
DAVID OLOWU
Respondent:
ANNE MILGRAM, STAURT RABNER and LEEANN CUNNINGHAM
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DENMON v. RICCI et al
as 2:2007cv04900
Petitioner:
LESTER M. DENMON
Respondent:
MICHELLE RICCI and STAURT RABNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RODRIGUEZ v. ROGERS et al
as 2:2007cv04776
Petitioner:
ROBERTO RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
GRACE ROGERS and STAURT RABNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ARUANNO v. BLODGETT et al
as 1:2007cv02789
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ARUANNO
Defendant:
WAYNE BLODGETT, DAVID PARRISH, CAULK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCLARY v. RICCI et al
as 2:2007cv02136
Plaintiff:
QURAN MCCLARY
Defendant:
MICHELLE RICCI and STAURT RABNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
WASHINGTON v. RICCI et al
as 2:2007cv01405
Petitioner:
JAMES WASHINGTON
Respondent:
MICHELLE RICCI and STAURT RABNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEBRON v. SHERRER et al
as 2:2007cv01284
Plaintiff:
RALPH LEBRON
Defendant:
LYDELL SHERRER and STAURT RABNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JULES v. BALICKI et al
as 2:2007cv01106
Petitioner:
CIRILIEN JULES
Respondent:
KAREN BALICKI and STAURT RABNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YOUNG v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2007cv00709
Plaintiff:
NORRIS YOUNG
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STAURT RABNER, GEORGE HAYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
