Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v. Boire et al
as 8:2021cv00666
Defendant:
Clifford Joseph Sterling, Veteran Transport, Neway Truck Sales & Leasing, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Stevens v. Cuomo et al
as 9:2021cv00306
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Andrew Cuomo, T. Harrigan and others
Plaintiff:
Sterling Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sterling v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2020cv01005
Plaintiff:
Sarah E. Sterling
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Stevens v. Bell et al
as 9:2020cv00853
Defendant:
C. Delutis, Sergeant Duquette, Earl Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Sterling Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00474
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01343
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Sterling Insurance Company v. Watts Regulator Co.
as 1:2018cv00341
Plaintiff:
Sterling Insurance Company
Defendant:
Watts Regulator Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv01350
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Baccus v. The State of S.C. et al
as 9:2013cv01474
Petitioner:
John R. Baccus
Respondent:
The State of S.C., William R. Byars, Jr. and Bryant Sterlings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
