Cases 1 - 10 of 23
JONES JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv06819
Plaintiff:
STEVEN DOUGLAS JONES JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRYANT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv02302
Plaintiff:
STEVEN DOUGLAS BRYANT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. GIBBS et al
as 5:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JOSEPH DAVIS
Defendant:
RICHARD LEE GIBBS, BATCHELOR, MURRAY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOFFITT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08581
Plaintiff:
STEVEN DOUGLAS MOFFITT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SIMPSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15534
Plaintiff:
STEVEN DOUGLAS SIMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
INMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12709
Plaintiff:
STEVEN DOUGLAS INMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MOFFITT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv25164
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN DOUGLAS MOFFITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHERMAN v. BURLESON et al
as 3:2021cv00537
Defendant:
JANE DOE, J D HOLLAND, CASTRO and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN DOUGLAS SHERMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHULL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv15286
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN DOUGLAS SHULL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAYLOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv85911
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN DOUGLAS TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
