Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Steven Michael Banks Hubbard Jr. v. Bureau of Prisons Rubidoux RRC
as 2:2024cv00386
Petitioner:
Steven Michael Banks Hubbard Jr.
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons Rubidoux RRC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(HC) Lopez v. Hixton
as 1:2023cv01368
Petitioner:
Steven Michael Lopez
Respondent:
Kevin Hixton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(SS) Sossamon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01187
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Sossamon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Michael v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv08753
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Steven Michael Skates v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv01610
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Skates
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service, Mark Gerard Beddow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
(HC) Sandstrom v. Warden
as 1:2021cv01618
Petitioner:
Steven Michael Sandstrom
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sandstrom v. Warden
as 3:2021cv08452
Petitioner:
Steven Michael Sandstrom
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Steven Michael Rochin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv04414
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Rochin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Greco D.O. et al v. Matthew Todd Ahern DO et al
as 3:2021cv00155
Defendant:
Encinitas Hospitalist Associates, Scott Alan Eisman MD, Marisa M. Magana MD and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Warren Larue and Gabriella Francesca Greco D.O.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 mm
(PC)Dayton v. Reilly et al
as 2:2020cv02093
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Dayton
Defendant:
Reilly and Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
