Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Stinson v. Mark Yates and Wall & Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02077
Plaintiff: Mark T. Stinson
Defendant: Mark Yates, Wall & Associates, Inc., John P. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. J. Dorsey, et al
as 23-5930
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee: J. DORSEY, BOP Officer and UNKNOWN SUPERIOR OFFICERS
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. Betty Williams, et al
as 23-5918
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee: BETTY WILLIAMS and NATHAN BURTON
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, Jr., et al
as 23-5869
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN THOMAS FOWLKES, JR., DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, SR., NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others
Stinson, III v. Schiebner We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv11201
Plaintiff: James Allen Stinson, III
Defendant: James Schiebner
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, Jr., et al
as 23-5291
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN THOMAS FOWLKES, JR., DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, SR., NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. USA
as 23-5120
Petitioner / Appellant: MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, Jr., et al
as 23-5113
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN THOMAS FOWLKES, JR., DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, SR., NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. USA
as 23-5105
Petitioner / Appellant: MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, Jr., et al
as 23-5086
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN THOMAS FOWLKES, JR., DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, SR., NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?