Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Sonderling v. Stout Risius Ross, LLC
as 1:2026cv11283
Petitioner:
Keith E Sonderling
Respondent:
Stout Risius Ross, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Walker v. Stout et al
as 1:2026cv10380
Plaintiff:
Latricia Walker
Defendant:
Michael Stout and Outlaw Co. LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Cearlock v. Sutton et al
as 3:2025cv01951
Plaintiff:
Jon Evan Cearlock
Defendant:
Autumn Danielle Sutton, Allison Stout Moore, Allen Lawless and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loggins v. Hastings et al
as 3:2025cv01202
Plaintiff:
Dontra' Q. Loggins
Defendant:
Aldridge, Brumleve, Darren Hyte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macklin v. Germak et al
as 3:2025cv00527
Plaintiff:
Derrick Macklin
Defendant:
C/O Germak, Ethan Clary, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stout v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2025pq00148
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Lile Stout
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hayden et al v. LOreal USA, Inc., et al
as 1:2024cv12296
Defendant:
SoftSheen-Carson, LLC, LOreal USA Products, Inc. and LOreal USA, Inc.,
Plaintiff:
Tamara Hayden and Charles Stout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.