Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Foremost Insurance Company of Grand Rapids, Michigan v. Copi et al
as 3:2023cv03033
Plaintiff:
Foremost Insurance Company of Grand Rapids, Michigan
Defendant:
David Copi, Gail Copi, Gail's Home Daycare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
McCray v. Melchor et al
as 1:2022cv01423
Plaintiff:
Rochelle McCray
Defendant:
Hector Melchor, Stephen Brown, Kerri Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Governor of Illinois J.B. et al
as 3:2022cv03237
Plaintiff:
Aaron Edwards
Defendant:
Governor of Illinois J.B., Donald Trump, Mary Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Sangamon County Sheriff's Detention Facility et al
as 3:2022cv03209
Plaintiff:
Aaron Edwards
Defendant:
Sangamon County Sheriff's Detention Facility, County Court Judge, William Vig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Summers v. Graham et al
as 3:2022cv03201
Plaintiff:
Justin Summers
Defendant:
Laura Graham, . Boerenson, Justin Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Cambell et al
as 3:2022cv03176
Plaintiff:
Aaron Edwards
Defendant:
Jack Cambell, Donald Trump, Mary Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Croom v. Liles et al
as 1:2021cv01300
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Croom
Defendant:
J Liles, Andrew Smith, B Summer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meeks v. Heuerman et al
as 2:2021cv02110
Plaintiff:
Brandon J Meeks
Defendant:
Brad Passalacqua, Jacob Paul, Dustin Heuerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Summers v. Sullivan
as 2:2018cv02314
Undetermined:
Habeas Attorney General
Respondent:
Daniel Q Sullivan
Petitioner:
Steven D Summers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Seiler v. Kruse et al
as 1:2017cv01370
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Seiler
Defendant:
Victor Kruse and John Summers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
