Civil Rights Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv07590
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STATE TROOPERS FRATERNAL ASSOCIATION OF N.J., INC. v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv01065
Plaintiff: STATE TROOPERS FRATERNAL ASSOCIATION OF N.J., INC.
Defendant: STATE OF NEW JERSEY and SUPERINTENDENT OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE JOSEPH R. FUENTES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv03256
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PERCELY et al v. BOROUGH OF NETCONG et al
as 2:2010cv05678
Plaintiff: DAVID J. PERCELY and BETH L. ACKERMAN
Defendant: BOROUGH OF NETCONG, NETCONG POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANTHONY COPPOLELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02972
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STATE TROOPER FRATERNAL ASSOCIATION et al v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv03820
Plaintiff: STATE TROOPER FRATERNAL ASSOCIATION and ONE NEW JERSEY STATE TROOPER
Defendant: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF STATE POLICE and SUPERINTENDENT OF STATE POLICE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
THOMAS v. FARBER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv04720
Plaintiff: DARYL K. THOMAS
Defendant: VULIMA V. FARBER, SEAN F. DALTON, GLOUCESTER COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
MORRIS v. ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al
as 3:2003cv01001
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER MORRIS
Defendant: ATTORNEY GENERAL , GLYNN MOORE , MARC STEPHENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?