Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Martin Robles v. Superintendent NJ State Prison, et al
as 13-4658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN ROBLES
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Darnell Dixon v. Superintendent New Jersey Stat, et al
as 13-4652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL DIXON
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Justice Allah v. Greg Bartkowski, et al
as 13-3466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTICE RASIDEEN ALLAH
Defendant - Appellee:
GREG BARTKOWSKI, Administrator New Jersey State Prison, MICHELE R. RICCI, Director of the Division of Operations New Jersey Department of Corrections/Former Administrator of New Jersey State Prison, CHRISTOPHER HOLMES, Associate Administrator, New Jersey State Prison and others
Lawrence Philson v. Superintendent New Jersey Stat
as 12-3811
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE OLIVER PHILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON
Alim Hassan v. Michelle Ricci, et al
as 11-3722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALIM HASSAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE RICCI, Superintendent, New Jersey State Prison, ATTY GEN NJ and HUDSON CTY PROS
PHILSON v. SUPERINTENDENT, NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON
as 3:2011cv01884
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE OLIVER PHILSON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Patel v. Hayman, et al
as 11-1469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIMPY PATEL
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE HAYMAN, COMMISSIONER, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES BARBO, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LYDELL SHERRER, ACTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DIV. OF OPERATIONS, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Ramon Hernandez v. Roy Hendricks, et al
as 10-3684
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAMON HERNANDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ROY L. HENDRICKS, Superintendent, New Jersey State Prison and ATTY GEN NJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
