Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Manuel Gonzalez, III v. USDCLA
as 10-71848
:
In re: MANUEL ANTONIO GONZALEZ, III
Petitioner:
MANUEL ANTONIO GONZALEZ, III
Respondent:
USDC, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
WARDEN, SVSP
Barksdale v. Cermeno et al
as 5:2009cv05028
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dean Barksdale
Defendant:
J. Cermeno , D. Johnston and SVSP-CDCR Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barksdale v. Cermeno et al
as 4:2009cv05028
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dean Barksdale
Defendant:
J. Cermeno, D. Johnston and SVSP-CDCR Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Medina v. M. Evans, et al
as 09-55934
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY RAMONA MEDINA
Respondent - Appellee:
M. S. EVANS, Warden, SVSP and BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General, Attorney General of the State of California
Jumah Abdullahi Moore Ali v. C. Matthews, et al
as 09-15910
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EUGENE MOORE, AKA Jumah Thomas Moore Abdullahi Ali
Defendant - Appellee:
C. MATTHEWS, SVSP Nurse, M. ARROYO, SVSP Nurse and C. VOGEL-PACE, SVSP Nurse
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
PARS SVSP Inc et al v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company et al
as 3:2009cv00601
Plaintiff:
PARS SVSP Inc and PARS Sorrento Valley Science Park I, LP
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, GMA Insurance Adjusters, Inc., Michael Banfield and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Dale Waterloo v. M. Evan
as 08-56692
Petitioner - Appellant:
DALE LYNN WATERLOO
Respondent - Appellee:
M. S. EVANS, Warden , SVSP
Berringer v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2007cv04598
Plaintiff:
Anthony S. Berringer
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, SVSP Department of Mental Health and M. Chaverine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. SVSP Officials et al
as 5:2007cv00344
Plaintiff:
Vernon Williams
Defendant:
SVSP Officials, Officers C - SATF, Officers SVSP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
