Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ramirez v. Solberg et al
as 1:2023cv09116
Plaintiff:
Franco Ramirez
Defendant:
Robert Finn Solberg and Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Logan et al v. Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00868
Plaintiff:
Craig Logan, Love Williams, Thomas Murphy and others
Defendant:
Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc. and Clean Harbors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Zhen v. Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06015
Defendant:
Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc. and Christopher Meyer
Plaintiff:
Jiang Ling Zhen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Commercial Lubricants, LLC v. Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc.
as 1:2014cv07483
Plaintiff:
Commercial Lubricants, LLC
Defendant:
Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc. v. Silogram Lubricants Corporation
as 1:2012cv04849
Plaintiff:
Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Silogram Lubricants Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Ramsewack v. Safety Kleen Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv02747
Defendant:
Silvio W. Becchetti and Safety Kleen Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ramsewack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
State of CT v. American Hoechst Corp et al
as 3:2008cv01504
Defendant:
American Hoechst Corp, Akzo Nobel Coatings Inc, Akzo Nobel Inc and others
Plaintiff:
State of CT and State of CT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America v. American Hoechst Corp et al
as 3:2008cv01509
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
American Hoechst Corp, Akzo Nobel Coatings Inc, Akzo Nobel Inc and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
