Cases 1 - 10 of 15
George v. Gordinez et al
as 3:2015cv01421
Plaintiff:
Vincent M George, Jr.
Defendant:
Salvadore Gordinez, Warden Hodges, M. Mayfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redd v. Gordinez et al
as 1:2015cv01379
Plaintiff:
Darius Redd
Defendant:
Salvador Gordinez, Illinois Department Of Corrections and Warden Tasada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George v. Gordinez et al
as 1:2014cv08795
Plaintiff:
Vincent M George, Jr.
Defendant:
Salvadore Gordinez, Warden Hodges, M. Mayfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Becerra v. Dart et al
as 1:2013cv01388
Plaintiff:
Cesar Becerra
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Cook County, Salvador Gordinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Becerra v. Dart et al
as 1:2013cv04879
Plaintiff:
Cesar Becerra
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Cook County, Salvador Gordinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Becerra v. Dart et al
as 1:2012cv09224
Plaintiff:
Cesar Becerra
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Cook County, Mr. Mauresse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kupferschmidt v. Gordinez et al
as 1:2012cv04253
Plaintiff:
Richard Kupferschmidt
Defendant:
Salvadore Gordinez, Mr. Moreci, Sargeant Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Dart et al
as 1:2010cv01857
Plaintiff:
Bryan Thomas
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Salvador Gordinez, Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper, et al vs. Dart, et al
as 1:2009cv07864
Plaintiff:
Darnell Cooper, Kevin Rucker and Daruosh Ebrahimi
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Salvadore Gordinez, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adedeji v. Gordinez et al
as 1:2009cv06537
Plaintiff:
Abayomi Adedeji
Defendant:
Salvadore Gordinez, Tom Dart and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
