Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Carwie v. Mobile County et al
as 1:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
J. Gregory Carwie
Defendant:
Mobile County, Alabama, Sam Cochran and Noah Price "Tre Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carwie v. Mobile County et al
as 1:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
J. Gregory Carwie
Defendant:
Mobile County, Sam Cochran and Noah Price (Trey) Oliver, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00114
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Muhammad v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. et al
as 1:2017cv00379
Plaintiff:
Bernice Muhammad
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA, N.A., Option One Mortgage Corporation, Sirote & Permutt, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. City Of Mobile et al
as 1:2017cv00143
Plaintiff:
Angela Scott
Defendant:
City Of Mobile , Melissa Hollis , Sam Cochran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
William Lucy v. Judge Johnston, et al
as 14-14916
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM N. LUCY
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE JOHNSTON, SAM COCHRAN, TREY OLIVER and others
West v. Cochran
as 1:2014cv00218
Plaintiff:
Robert West
Defendant:
Sam Cochran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucy v. Johnston et al
as 1:2014cv00185
Plaintiff:
William N. Lucy
Defendant:
Judge Johnston, Sam Cochran, Trey Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. HSBC Bank USA, NA et al
as 1:2013cv00617
Plaintiff:
Bernice Muhammad
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA, NA, Merrill Lynch & Co., Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investore Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
